A World Trade Organization panel ruled Monday that the European Union has not complied with an order to end illegal subsidies for plane maker Airbus, which prompted the Trump administration to impose tariffs on nearly USD 7.5 billion worth of EU goods in October.
In its ruling, a WTO compliance panel found that the EU had not taken sufficient steps to end harm to Boeing, the major rival to Europe's Airbus. The EU is expected to appeal, though the United States is on the cusp of preventing the WTO's appeals court the Appellate Body from ruling on any new appeals.
Responding to Monday's ruling, the EU's executive Commission faulted the panel for making a number of serious legal errors in its assessment of EU compliance, and said its recommended ways of compliance would be very problematic for a larger part of the WTO membership.
The European Commission will decide on its course of action in light of this assessment, including the possibility of bringing an appeal in order to have these legal errors corrected, it said in a statement.
The commission also alluded to a decision expected next year by a WTO arbitrator in a case of illegal U.S. government support for Boeing, which could give the EU authorization to slap tariffs on U.S. goods.
The Airbus case centers on so-called "launch aid" from the EU that WTO judges ruled had dented impeded sales for aircraft from Boeing in the twin-aisle and very large aircraft markets.
In May last year, the Appellate Body agreed that the EU and four of its member states Britain, France, Germany and Spain had failed to abide by an earlier compliance panel ruling. The EU insisted in subsequent arguments that the subsidies had been lifted, and that proper steps were taken to remove the subsidies' harmful impact on Boeing.
More From This Section
A final resolution could be made more difficult because the WTO's appellate body, which has final say in trade dispute cases, is set to become unable to hear new cases starting next week.
Under WTO rules, the Appellate Body must have at least three members, and the terms of two of its three members are set to expire Dec. 11. The United States has singlehandedly blocked any new appointments, alleging that the body's members have overstepped WTO rules and draw excessive salaries and perks, among other things.
It is unclear whether the Appellate Body's three members will continue to work on outstanding cases after the two terms expire. Sometimes, its judges work on pending cases even after their terms expire.