On June 2, a man was surfing the web when he stumbled upon a video that made him call up his friend. It was a nude video of his friend’s 25-year-old sister who lived in Mumbai. The video had been allegedly shot by the woman’s estranged husband and uploaded on an X-rated site from a cyber café in Vasai in what appeared to be a clear case of ‘revenge porn’. Though shocked and distraught, the victim mustered the courage to report the matter to the police. The Navghar police in Mumbai, who arrested the man, say he had installed a camera in their bedroom and secretly filmed his wife. When their marriage broke down, they say, he hit back by posting the video on the Net.
Revenge porn is emerging as a growing Internet menace in which someone seeks revenge by posting private, intimate and explicit pictures or videos on the social media or porn sites in order to shame and embarrass a former partner, destroy reputation and cause mental agony. “In most of the cases, the woman is the victim, though I have also dealt with cases where the man was victimised,” says Pavan Duggal, Supreme Court advocate and cyber law specialist. Explicit and intimate selfies taken and mailed to the boyfriend or the husband when all is hunky-dory can turn into a living hell if the relationship sours, and the person decides to teach the ex a lesson. “What’s worse, the victim is stigmatised by her family, friends and society for being part of it. Somewhere, she too feels guilty of having allowed it,” says Suneel Vatsyayan, relationship counsellor and chairman, Nada India Foundation that works on women and child issues.
The menace is widespread, but most incidents go unreported for fear of social ridicule. Cyber law specialists say in the last two years, incidents of revenge porn have gone up almost five times, facilitated by smart phones, webcams and affordable spycams. “A higher number of cases are being reported from smaller cities where it is far easier to defame a person,” says Duggal. “Many consenting adults in these cities are not aware of the ramifications of such content when they voluntarily engage in it.” According to CNN, a survey of 864 individuals by Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, estimated that 80 per cent of revenge porn victims had themselves shot their intimate pictures or videos. And with India undergoing a mobile web revolution — 61 per cent of all Internet users access it on their mobile phones — it has become easy to post such content. Couples are also sometimes okay with sharing their passwords, which can also allow unauthorised access to intimate pictures, cautions cyber law specialist Na Vijayashankar.
Revenge porn is today a worldwide threat. The Economist recently reported that in Japan “the number of cases reported to police more than tripled, to 27,334, between 2008 and 2012.” In the same article, John Di Giacomo of Revision Legal, a Michigan-based law firm, said that at least 3,000 porn websites around the world today feature the revenge genre.
There are plenty of ways of filming the target even after a breakup. “Revenge porn is not a cottage industry; it is a specialised industry,” says Duggal. The output can be captured on a spycam planted in changing rooms, if the perpetrator knows that this is the place the woman frequents. A spycam can be planted in a hotel room if the perpetrator has prior knowledge that the victim would be staying there. Revenge porn is also committed by hacking into the computer camera of the ex. There are professionals and specialists who will do this for a price. Those who keep the laptop on through the night are especially vulnerable. Revenge porn is also no longer an adult phenomenon. “I have seen it being committed at school by children below 18,” says Duggal.
The trauma for the victim doesn’t fade away. A 24-year-old New Jersey resident, who finally gathered the courage to speak out a few years after she became a victim of revenge porn that saw her pictures being posted on over 200 websites, said: “I have had people show up at my door; have had people recognise me in public... I struggle every day wondering if I am going to find a job or are they going to give me a hard time because a simple Google search might be able to pull out the pictures that were posted without my permission.”
Retrieving an image once it is leaked on the Internet can be a nightmare. “If a woman does not want the video or picture on the Internet, the authorities can ask the intermediary, such as Facebook, Twitter or Google, to have it removed,” says Vijayashankar. But the intermediary is unlikely to reveal to the victim the name of the person who might have posted it online. For this, the court or a law enforcing agency will have to intervene. If the content is being circulated on a smartphone, then the service provider, if it is located in India, is duty-bound to provide details. However, if he is located outside India, then it could be a problem.
As the fear of having their slanderous picture leaked becomes real, an increasing number of couples are now including social media in their prenuptial agreements. The deal is that no intimate secret or picture will be shared in case of a breakup.
There are provisions in the Information Technology, or IT, Act 2000 under which the perpetrator can be taken to task. But the law also needs to make it easier to retrieve or pull down objectionable content so that the victim’s reputation and life aren’t at stake.
Revenge porn is emerging as a growing Internet menace in which someone seeks revenge by posting private, intimate and explicit pictures or videos on the social media or porn sites in order to shame and embarrass a former partner, destroy reputation and cause mental agony. “In most of the cases, the woman is the victim, though I have also dealt with cases where the man was victimised,” says Pavan Duggal, Supreme Court advocate and cyber law specialist. Explicit and intimate selfies taken and mailed to the boyfriend or the husband when all is hunky-dory can turn into a living hell if the relationship sours, and the person decides to teach the ex a lesson. “What’s worse, the victim is stigmatised by her family, friends and society for being part of it. Somewhere, she too feels guilty of having allowed it,” says Suneel Vatsyayan, relationship counsellor and chairman, Nada India Foundation that works on women and child issues.
The menace is widespread, but most incidents go unreported for fear of social ridicule. Cyber law specialists say in the last two years, incidents of revenge porn have gone up almost five times, facilitated by smart phones, webcams and affordable spycams. “A higher number of cases are being reported from smaller cities where it is far easier to defame a person,” says Duggal. “Many consenting adults in these cities are not aware of the ramifications of such content when they voluntarily engage in it.” According to CNN, a survey of 864 individuals by Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, estimated that 80 per cent of revenge porn victims had themselves shot their intimate pictures or videos. And with India undergoing a mobile web revolution — 61 per cent of all Internet users access it on their mobile phones — it has become easy to post such content. Couples are also sometimes okay with sharing their passwords, which can also allow unauthorised access to intimate pictures, cautions cyber law specialist Na Vijayashankar.
Revenge porn is today a worldwide threat. The Economist recently reported that in Japan “the number of cases reported to police more than tripled, to 27,334, between 2008 and 2012.” In the same article, John Di Giacomo of Revision Legal, a Michigan-based law firm, said that at least 3,000 porn websites around the world today feature the revenge genre.
Pavan Duggal
The trauma for the victim doesn’t fade away. A 24-year-old New Jersey resident, who finally gathered the courage to speak out a few years after she became a victim of revenge porn that saw her pictures being posted on over 200 websites, said: “I have had people show up at my door; have had people recognise me in public... I struggle every day wondering if I am going to find a job or are they going to give me a hard time because a simple Google search might be able to pull out the pictures that were posted without my permission.”
Retrieving an image once it is leaked on the Internet can be a nightmare. “If a woman does not want the video or picture on the Internet, the authorities can ask the intermediary, such as Facebook, Twitter or Google, to have it removed,” says Vijayashankar. But the intermediary is unlikely to reveal to the victim the name of the person who might have posted it online. For this, the court or a law enforcing agency will have to intervene. If the content is being circulated on a smartphone, then the service provider, if it is located in India, is duty-bound to provide details. However, if he is located outside India, then it could be a problem.
As the fear of having their slanderous picture leaked becomes real, an increasing number of couples are now including social media in their prenuptial agreements. The deal is that no intimate secret or picture will be shared in case of a breakup.
There are provisions in the Information Technology, or IT, Act 2000 under which the perpetrator can be taken to task. But the law also needs to make it easier to retrieve or pull down objectionable content so that the victim’s reputation and life aren’t at stake.
THE SELFIE YOU SHOULD BE WARY OF
WHAT THE LAW SAYS
|