The constitution of a high-level committee under the chairmanship of former President of India Ram Nath Kovind to examine the possibility of holding simultaneous elections right before a busy election season has raised questions. In terms of choice members, the committee should have had more representation (even though the Congress floor leader in the Lok Sabha opted out). Though the proposal has merit, in terms of sparing politicians the problem of being perpetually in election mode, there would be practical difficulties. The Kovind committee would do well to hold widespread consultations before submitting its report. The government would also be well advised not to rush, as intended changes can have significant political consequences, says the top edit. Read it here
In other views:
Ajay Shah says policy makers need to create conditions for the people to adapt to climate change. Read it here
Sunita Narain explains why agriculture and climate change need to be discussed in the differing contexts of the two worlds -- of large, industrialised farming and small landholdings. Read it here
Tamal Bandyopadhyay examines Mahindra & Mahindra's investment in RBL Bank. Read it here
The second edit says Sebi’s proposal to create an independent performance evaluation agency will help investors. Read it here
More From This Section
QUOTE OF THE DAY“The idea of ‘one nation, one election’ is an attack on the Indian Union and all its States”
Tweet by Rahul Gandhi