Business Standard

An artist in chains

Panahi's Closed Curtain is an explicit comment on his real-life situation

A still from Iranian director Jafar Panahi's new meta-film <I>Closed Curtain</I>

A still from Iranian director Jafar Panahi's new meta-film <I>Closed Curtain</I>

Jai Arjun Singh New Delhi
I'm sure it's the right address," the woman says, "No other house looks like this one." She is searching for her sister who, she has been told, hid in this beachside villa two nights ago. But the door has now been opened by a stout, middle-aged man who knows nothing about the missing girl.

The man is the Iranian director Jafar Panahi, playing himself, and this is a scene late in Panahi's new meta-film Closed Curtain, a work that might puzzle anyone who doesn't know the celebrated filmmaker's real-life story: the ban on his movie-making following charges of anti-government propaganda, the house arrest, his continuing fugitive attempts to practice his art, and to do so by making films that explicitly comment on his own situation. His last movie - with its poignantly ironic title This is Not a Film - was shot partly on iPhone and featured him talking to the camera about the projects he has in his head, projects he is no longer permitted to bring to cinematic life. Closed Curtain, by contrast, begins by appearing to be a narrative film (about a screenwriter and his impossibly cute dog) - and for a few scenes it is as if Panahi has succeeded in realising one of the visions he discussed in This is Not a Film.
 
But around the halfway point, we are reminded again that nothing in this director's life and work fall within the bounds of "normalcy" any longer. The narrative is interrupted, the fourth wall is, almost literally, torn down: Panahi enters the house that has been the scene of the action so far; he takes down curtains, revealing wall-posters of his own previous films. The characters we saw in the conventional-narrative section of the film - the screenwriter, his dog, two people seeking shelter from the authorities - stop functioning as elements of a coherent story and begin to move in and out of our line of vision, seeming less like real people and more like phantoms (perhaps ghostly manifestations of half-structured ideas in the mind of a writer-director who lives in chains). Other people come in and interact with Panahi, but again we are unsure whether they are "real" or visitations from another half-imagined story.

These intersecting narratives touch on similar matters: being in hiding with the things that are most important to you, trying to get your work done, or simply living your life, with the constant threat of someone bursting in and taking everything away. The writer in the "regular" narrative must cover all his windows with black curtains, because dogs are considered unclean by the regime he lives under; the writer-director Panahi in the meta-narrative doesn't have the freedom or resources to tell his story properly, or to engage with the world while telling it, which means there are metaphorical black curtains around his mind. The dog follows the writer around everywhere, tennis ball in mouth; likewise, Panahi's ideas and fictional creations don't stop pursuing him, demanding every moment of his time.

As Panahi and his fictional characters move in orbit around each other, other questions arise too. We often romanticise highbrow art as an essentially closed process - being principally about the relationship between the artist and his creations, like the literary writer who says "I write primarily for myself" - but does art have any value, or purpose, if it cannot (at least to a limited degree) be shared? And then, if it does reach the outside world, can the relationship be strictly one-sided? What happens when the world begins to intrude on it, deconstruct it, or even demand that it conforms to certain standards, values or rules?

All of which means that Closed Curtain is a self-conscious, self-referential film, but given its context it is also a deeply moving work, an artist's cry of defiance. In terms of form, it is abstract and "difficult" - and likely to infuriate many viewers who prefer linear storytelling - but it is also a plea for greater openness, for doors to be unbarred, for curtains to be removed. And the woman in that scene mentioned above is dead right on one front: if this secluded villa is a metaphor for Panahi's current cinema (or the mind striving to produce that cinema), it is true that no other house looks anything like it.
Jai Arjun Singh is a Delhi-based writer

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: Nov 08 2013 | 9:26 PM IST

Explore News