I'm sure it's the right address," the woman says, "No other house looks like this one." She is searching for her sister who, she has been told, hid in this beachside villa two nights ago. But the door has now been opened by a stout, middle-aged man who knows nothing about the missing girl.
The man is the Iranian director Jafar Panahi, playing himself, and this is a scene late in Panahi's new meta-film Closed Curtain, a work that might puzzle anyone who doesn't know the celebrated filmmaker's real-life story: the ban on his movie-making following charges of anti-government propaganda, the house arrest, his continuing fugitive attempts to practice his art, and to do so by making films that explicitly comment on his own situation. His last movie - with its poignantly ironic title This is Not a Film - was shot partly on iPhone and featured him talking to the camera about the projects he has in his head, projects he is no longer permitted to bring to cinematic life. Closed Curtain, by contrast, begins by appearing to be a narrative film (about a screenwriter and his impossibly cute dog) - and for a few scenes it is as if Panahi has succeeded in realising one of the visions he discussed in This is Not a Film.
But around the halfway point, we are reminded again that nothing in this director's life and work fall within the bounds of "normalcy" any longer. The narrative is interrupted, the fourth wall is, almost literally, torn down: Panahi enters the house that has been the scene of the action so far; he takes down curtains, revealing wall-posters of his own previous films. The characters we saw in the conventional-narrative section of the film - the screenwriter, his dog, two people seeking shelter from the authorities - stop functioning as elements of a coherent story and begin to move in and out of our line of vision, seeming less like real people and more like phantoms (perhaps ghostly manifestations of half-structured ideas in the mind of a writer-director who lives in chains). Other people come in and interact with Panahi, but again we are unsure whether they are "real" or visitations from another half-imagined story.
More From This Section
As Panahi and his fictional characters move in orbit around each other, other questions arise too. We often romanticise highbrow art as an essentially closed process - being principally about the relationship between the artist and his creations, like the literary writer who says "I write primarily for myself" - but does art have any value, or purpose, if it cannot (at least to a limited degree) be shared? And then, if it does reach the outside world, can the relationship be strictly one-sided? What happens when the world begins to intrude on it, deconstruct it, or even demand that it conforms to certain standards, values or rules?
All of which means that Closed Curtain is a self-conscious, self-referential film, but given its context it is also a deeply moving work, an artist's cry of defiance. In terms of form, it is abstract and "difficult" - and likely to infuriate many viewers who prefer linear storytelling - but it is also a plea for greater openness, for doors to be unbarred, for curtains to be removed. And the woman in that scene mentioned above is dead right on one front: if this secluded villa is a metaphor for Panahi's current cinema (or the mind striving to produce that cinema), it is true that no other house looks anything like it.
Jai Arjun Singh is a Delhi-based writer