Big-small problem

I have been using a Fiat Palio NV for the last four years and am planning to replace it with another hatchback, since traffic conditions in New Delhi don't allow me the luxury of a sedan. I've narrowed down my choices to the Chevrolet Aveo U-VA and the Hyundai Getz Prime 1.1. Daily use is limited to in-city driving, not exceeding 60 km, hence fuel efficiency is definitely a concern. I am tempted to go for the Getz Prime 1.1 for its roominess and compact looks. It also seems to have a tried and tested engine. Would you rate it as a better choice than the Aveo U-VA?

Akhtar SK, via email

Both cars are equally good at the job they do, though in this case, we think the Hyundai Getz 1.1 would be ideal for you. It's quite well built on both the inside and the outside, has a reasonably peppy, frugal engine and is backed up by a wide service network. The Aveo U-VA, though equally competent, is slightly behind in these areas. Prime yourself for the Getz.

 

Of sons and fathers

I am replacing my 2003 Honda City 1.3, and have short listed the Chevrolet Aveo U-VA and the Hyundai i10. I've test driven the U-VA and found it to be a smooth operator, with adequate power and handling capabilities, besides the wonderful space advantage. The exterior design is also to my liking, but the trim levels can be bettered. What I did not like was that there is no ABS/airbag option, and that it lacked an integrated stereo, which I feel should be the standard on top-end models. While I haven't evaluated the i10, I find it good, but was more impressed by the U-VA's space and general driving feel. Unfortunately, it's my father who will be making the purchase, and he is more inclined towards the i10 and finds Chevrolet's service suspect. Also, do you think that the presence of airbags and ABS figures higher than a car's competence?

Ashish, via email

It's not entirely true that the Aveo U-VA doesn't come with features like ABS and a stereo, though these are part of the Option Pack on the LT variant. You are right about the U-VA's comfort, though when compared to the i10 in totality, the U-VA seems to show its age. The i10 is not only better built, it's also more fun to drive, has more than adequate power and is frugal at the same time. Features like ABS and airbags are good to have, though in this case they are useful features on a car that is already quite competent. Listen to your father and go for the i10.

20-20

I'm at a senior post in my firm and the company has offered to buy me a luxury car. Their budget allocation is around Rs 18-22 lakh and they have asked me to choose from among the Skoda Superb and the Toyota Camry. The car will generally be chauffeur driven, with the odd weekend outstation drive with the family. Fuel economy is not of much concern, since the company will bear a substantial part of the running expenses. Which car would be apt for me? Also, are there other options that I/my company should consider?

Viren Bhat, Mumbai

Both options are equally good in the chauffeur-driven segment and offer equally good back seat comfort. We would, however, suggest that you ask your company to also consider the new Honda Accord that is just a couple of weeks away from launch. It will have an improved version of the 2.4 iVTEC engine found on the last-gen Accord and up-to-date interior features and comfort. Not only is it expected to be as comfortable as the cars you've mentioned, it might also be cheaper, at Rs 18-20 lakh.

Any automotive questions?
Ask us at bijoy.y@bsmail.in