The Indian Debating Union does it all: disagrees, doubts and debates, but always with decorum.
I t’s not often you get to see people disagree respectfully in public. Uproar in Parliament, he-said-she-said press conferences, name-calling and mud-slinging on air are part of our everyday reality. So when everyone talked about the Indian Debating Union (IDU), I waited eagerly for July 30, for their second debate.
The advertisements declared loudly, “Want a fight?” Don’t we all? So soon after the July 5 Bharat Bandh, everyone had an opinion on the topic of debate: “This house would ban hartals and bandhs [industrial and political strikes].”
The IDU positions itself as a platform for free speech, informed opinion and convincing arguments supported by facts. Its members are carefully selected via rounds of screening on college campuses. Founded by Abhaey Singh, 31, IDU aims to be “India’s inspirational new platform for public debate”. Apolitical, sophisticated debate, cool argument, meticulous research and a sense of discipline maintain the focus on the debate, not on who shouts louder. What a refreshing change.
The audience proved fantastic as well. Friday evenings in Bandra, Mumbai, are chaos — with everyone in a hurry to get home or to some party or bar. But here were 200 people standing for the national anthem, sitting silently, listening intently, clapping appreciatively and arguing thoughtfully. Past 9.30 pm, as the Q&A continued, no one was in a hurry to leave. At the outset the audience were requested to register our opinions on the motion at hand — no “SMS A for yes” and “B for no”, just a missed call to a certain number depending on which side you chose. At the end, they took votes a second time. I’m not going to say which side had more takers, who ‘won’.
Every IDU member is a passionate debater, and also feels strongly about India. The mandate is to choose topics relevant to everyday concerns. The topic for the first debate, held in May at Mumbai’s Nehru Centre, was: “This house would repeal all constitutional amendments in favour of minority reservations.” Two speakers represent the Government and two represent the Opposition. No one represents any political party, so it’s easier to trust what each side is saying.
More From This Section
The IDU offers ideas, information, perspective and democratic participation, all in one evening, and all for, as their publicity says, “less than the cost of a soft drink at a posh bar”.
National debates
National Law School Debate |
State-level debates
UNHCR, WEBFUNA and Statesman “Voices” Debate |
The next debate will be in New Delhi in January 2011. For details, visit www.indiadebating.in