)
The Gujarat High Court today issued notices to the state government and 11 coal and lignite based thermal power stations, including those of Tata Power, Adani Power, Torrent Power and Essar Power, with regard to health and safety standards of workers of in the units.
The notices were issued by the division bench of Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Justice J B Pardiwala while taking suo motu cognizance of directions issued by the Supreme Court with regard to health and safety standards in thermal power plants.
Appearing on behalf of the state government senior government pleader Prakash Jani informed the court that there were 11 thermal power plants in Gujarat that used coal or lignite as fuel.
The court issued notices to state government's health department and labour department, and the 11 power stations and asked them to file reply by March 11, when the next hearing is scheduled.
The coal and lignite based thermal power plants in Gujarat include Ukai power station at Tapi, Gandhinagar TPS at Gandhinagar, Wanakbori TPS at Kheda, Sikka TPS at Jamnagar, Kutch lignite TPS at Lakhpat Kutch, Torrent power station at Ahmedabad, Essar Power station at Salaya, Jamnagar, Adani power station and Tata Power at Mundra, Kutch, GIPCL TPS at Mangrol, Surat and GMDC TPS at Kutch.
On January 31, the Supreme Court had directed the high courts of 18 states to examine whether the coal fired thermal power plants (CFTPPs) are complying with safety standards and regulations relating to health of their employees.
A bench of justices K S Radhakrishnan and A K Sikri relegated the issues to the high courts saying the CFTPPs are spread across the country and it would not be practical for the apex court to examine whether each of them are adhering to safety standards and rules.
The high courts of Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa, Haryana, Rajasthan, Punjab, Delhi/NCT Delhi, Gujarat,
Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Jharkhand and Assam have been asked to "initiate suo moto proceedings in the larger interest of the workers working in CFTPPs".
The apex court was acting on a petition filed by Occupational health and Safety Association.
