Before death of Priyamvada Birla, Rajendra Singh Lodha was a friend of Birla family but after the death, he has been identified as a villain", said Saktinath Mukherjee, counsel for R S Lodha, at the court of Justice K J Sengupta here today. |
Mukherjee was opposing the petition filed by two sisters of M P Birla, Laxmi Devi Newar and Radha Devi Mohatta, and also K K Birla, G P Birla, B K Birla and Yashovardhan Birla, seeking appointment of an individual administrator over the properties and assets of M P Birla estate. |
Mukherjee sought to establish that during her lifetime, Priyamvada Birla took her own decisions and firmly kept all the Birlas out. |
In this context, the counsel read out a letter of K P Tapuria, brother of Priyamvada, dated January 18, 1996, written to Priyamvada, where it was evident that Priyamvada used to act independently. |
Allegations made by the Birlas regarding the illiteracy of Priyamvada therefore did not have any substance, Mukherjee added. Mukherjee argued the relationship of the other Birlas with the M P Birla family was unhappy and was so for many years. |
The other Birlas therefore had no right to claim they were acting to protect the properties of M P Birla. |
The counsel stated Priyamvada relied on R S Lodha for years and no other Birla raised any objection when Priyamvada inducted R S Lodha and his son on the board of M P Birla group companies. |
Mukherjee read out another letter dated December 19, 1998, written by K N Tapuria to his sister complaining she was not interested in maintaining her relationship with Tapuria, to prove that their relations were bad. |
Allegations against R S Lodha relating to disposal of assets of Birla Synthetic and Soorah Jute Mill were baseless, the counsel added. The hearing will continue. |
Meanwhile, two sisters of M P Birla Laxmi Newar and Radha Mohata today filed a fresh case against R S Lodha, through a petition before the Company Law Board, (CLB), eastern region bench at Kolkata, alleging the fraudulent transfer of shares of East India Investment Company Pvt Ltd (EIICPL) by Lodha. |
CLB fixed January 12 as the date of hearing of the matter. In the petition it was alleged that Lodha had illegally transferred 33,715 shares of EIICP |
L in his favour before moving his probate petition before the Calcutta High Court. |
The transfer was effected on July 15, 2004, as a part of the scheme to gain control of the M P Birla group, the petition alleged. The petition sought a order of appointment of a special officer to take possession of those shares as well as register of members, minute book and other records of the company. |
Two sisters sought orders cancelling of the transfer standing in the name of late Priyamvada Birla and injunction restraining Lodha from exercising any rights relating to the shares. |