Dabur India has been restrained by the Supreme Court from using the packaged design for its popular health drink "Glucose-D" as it was similar to 'Glucon-D' owned by rival company Heinz Italia. |
The packaging of Glucose-D when compared to that of Glucon-D was so similar it could easily confuse a buyer, a bench of Justice B P Singh and Justice H S Bedi said while passing an interim injunction against Dabur India. |
The apex court passed the injunction on an appeal filed by Heinz Italia challenging the orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and a civil court, both of which declined to pass any injunction against the company. |
When contacted, a Dabur official said the company had discontinued the packaging scheme in 2003. |
Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Heinz, had argued that Glaxo started using "Glucon-D" in 1940 and passed it on to Heinz in 1994, along with the artistic rights used on the packaging. |
He alleged that Dabur had launched its own glucose drink in 1989 under the brand name "Glucose-D" which was similarly packaged to "confuse" the consumer and capitalise on the "enviable reputation" enjoyed by Glucon-D. |
However, Dabur argued glucose was a generic expression of the product being sold and Heinz could not claim any monopoly. |