Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata has dubbed as “completely untrue” critical comments attributed to him in an interview against Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and apologised for “any embarrassment” that the “misrepresentation” might have caused to the later or the government.
“I have always been one of your greatest admirers and supporters,” Tata has written to Singh, who responded by saying those in public life “inevitably face” criticism and it should be used constructively to guide the government.
Tata, who will step down as chairman on December 28 and subsequently take over as chairman Emeritus of Tata Sons, the holding company of Tata Group, has conveyed to Singh his “sense of shock at reading the completely untrue, sensationalised headlines and reporting of a recent interview” to the Financial Times of London.
| SET FOR DELAY |
| The Bill’s aim- The new proposal plans to distribute 25 kg of foodgrain at subsidised price to BPL and APL families |
| Old vs new- The new proposal seeks to prove 68% of the population is legally entitled to avail cheap foodgrain, against 64% in the original draft Bill |
| What held it back- Parliament’s standing committee on food failed to give its report on the Bill this session; it is likely to do so in the Budget session |
In his letter dated December 10, he referred to his press statement issued on December 8 and said he had clarified that “I have neither ‘lashed into the Prime Minister’, ‘rapped India’ nor ‘warned government of inaction’.”
Enclosing a transcript of the interview to show he never criticised the Prime Minister, Tata has told Singh, “I have always been one of your greatest admirers and supporters, publicly and privately.
“I have valued your trust and confidence at all times and I was very deeply aggrieved to have a publication of the repute of Financial Times of London misrepresent the comments of my interview with them and be the cause of any misunderstanding between you and me.”
Thanking Tata for his “kind words and support” expressed in the letter, Singh responded on December 12, “I have always believed that those in public life should be able to make constructive use of the criticism that they inevitably face about some of their actions. “Even as such criticism should persuade us to introspect about the path we are following, it is our conviction that should necessarily guide us forward.”
