Circumstantial evidence is enough to hold a public servant guilty under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) when direct evidence is absent, said the Supreme Court on Thursday.
A Constitution bench comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, V Ramasubramanian, B R Gavai, A S Bopanna and B V Nagarathna said that if direct oral or documentary evidence is not there in a graft case, circumstantial evidence will hold.
“In order to bring home the guilt of the accused, the prosecution has to first prove the demand of illegal gratification and the subsequent acceptance as a matter of fact. This fact in issue can