Business Standard

Petitioners argue against validity of anti-profiteering provisions at HC

They say the provision of interest is there in the rules under the Central GST Act, but it absent in the legislation itself

Delhi HC
Premium

Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
Petitioners in Delhi High Court on Thursday argued against the issue of imposing interest on companies for delayed payment of profiteered amounts calculated by the national anti-profiteering authority (NAA) under the goods and services tax (GST) regime.

In a case relating to constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions, petitioners said the provision of interest is there in the rules under the Central GST Act, but it is not there in the legislation itself.

Since interest is not provided for in the statute, it cannot be imposed, they argued.

"...The moot point is whether interest is applicable in the absence of statutory

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in