 "Madras HC stays cancellation of Greenpeace India registration")
Invoking its constitutional powers, the Supreme Court on Wednesday appointed a former high court judge, Justice Virendra Singh, as Uttar Pradesh’s Lok Ayukta after the state government failed to comply with its directives.
The apex court, while making the appointment that came as an embarrassment to the Samajwadi Party government, also expressed its disapproval over the “failure” of constitutional functionaries to comply with the orders of the highest court of the land.
The UP government failed to meet the Supreme Court deadline to appoint a Lok Ayukta even after two rounds of marathon talks, which failed to come up with a consensus name.
After a five-hour long meeting of three-member selection committee that ended around Tuesday midnight, failed to arrive at a conclusion, talks resumed on Wednesday morning at the residence of Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav in Lucknow.
However, even that meeting, lasting two hours, failed to come up with a name, despite Supreme Court order that the state government should submit a compliance report by Wednesday.
The apex court ordered the appointment of Virendra Singh, a former judge of the Allahabad High Court, after it examined 5 short-listed names for the post of the state’s ombudsman, and asked the state government to file a report by Saturday, indicating compliance with its order.
“The failure of constitutional functionaries to comply with the orders of the highest court of the land is deeply regretted and astonishing,” a Bench headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, adding, “We, therefore, proceed to exercise our right under Article 142 of the Constitution to remedy the situation by passing an appropriate order.” The Bench regretted that its several orders have not been “heeded” by the constitutional functionaries — the chief minister, the leader of opposition and the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court.
The Bench took strong note of the submission of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, that though it had shortlisted five names, no consensus has been arrived at on a specific person.
The law provides that a high-powered committee of the chief minister, the leader of opposition and the chief justice of the concerned high court together appoints the chief of the state ombudsman.
Earlier on Monday, the apex court had rapped the UP government for not appointing a Lok Ayukta in the state, despite its directions, saying it seemed that appointing authorities have their “own agenda”.
| COURSE OF EVENTS |
|
