A detailed unbiased scrutiny is necessary regarding foreign direct investment (FDI), thinks thinks eminent economist Amartya Sen. |
The views and analysis relating to FDI are often based pre-existing views and a general conclusion of its effect is not possible, he noted in his speech at the Press Club, Kolkata, today. |
"There is a need of minutely analysing the effects of FDI in a country and the economic rationale behind it and it is not correct to look for a general consensus of whether FDI should be allowed or protested," said Sen. |
There are complex matters relating to trade policy like patent law which needs greater scrutiny, noted Sen. China has made great progress thanks to huge FDI. |
"FDI in some sense is not a value in itself and an economy cannot solely depend on it for progress," he added. |
Agriculture performance depends greatly on the quality of labour involved in the activity, and not on factors like land, fertility, fertilisers and irrigation, he said. |
Failure in delivering proper basic education and healthcare acted as a constraint on agricultural performance. |
"Agricultural policy and land reforms are necessary but what is equally important is proper delivery of healthcare and education which significantly influences the quality of labour," said Sen. |
Micro credit facility was another major area of concern for overall performance of the agricultural sector and the rural population, Sen said. |
The economic and social costs of subsidies, Sen said, could be justified only if it went to the poor without fail. |
"Major emphasis should be given on the proper delivery of the subsidy. Government needs to see if the poor are really getting the benefit or not," he added. |