The Union ministry of mines has asked the Goa government to modify the lease boundaries as defined in the deed in order to allow mineral waste dumping outside the lease area for full resumption of mining in the state. The Supreme Court in April last year had banned dumping rejects and sub-grade ore outside the leasehold area.
"If dumping of tailings or sub-grade material or waste material is there in some areas outside the boundaries of the mine lease as specified in the lease deed, the problem can be easily sorted by modifying the lease boundaries as defined in the lease deed to include the dump area also," said Union Mines Minister Narendra Singh Tomar in a letter to Goa Chief Minister Laxmikant Parsekar.
"This will only require a rectification deed to be registered under the relevant rules," added the minister. Parsekar had requested Tomar to incorporate provisions for dumping mineral waste outside the leasehold areas in the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) to supersede a last year's Supreme Court judgment.
More From This Section
While lifting the ban on Goa mining last year, the apex court had refused to permit the mining companies to dump their waste outside the leased area, as it violated various mining and environment rules prescribed as per the law.
Discarding such waste outside of the mining area has been a common practice in Goa, as the lease holding area given to the miner is of small size (not more than 100 hectares in general).
However, the during the peak period of mining (2007-12), it was observed that such wastes were also sold to countries like China without any permission or royalty being levied on it. As a result, the court decided to end this practice.
According to Goa miners who have made several presentations to the government, it would be very difficult to restart mining in the state, particularly at a time when market prices of Goa's iron-ore (58 per cent Fe or below) have fallen to $45-50 per tonne.
"By incorporating provisions for dumping outside of leasehold areas, the operational and logistical difficulties faced by leaseholders in scientific and efficient extraction of ore, especially in smaller leased areas…would have been resolved by lawfully addressing any perceived conflict between extant situation and the SC judgment dated April 21, 2014," said Parsekar to Tomar in his letter dated May 6, 2015.