Business Standard

Delhi High Court serves notice on govt, GST Council in real estate case

As such, the prima facie evidence as required under the anti-profiteering provisions of the CGST Act does not exist, according to the petitioner.

real estate, realty, developers, lenders, mumbai, construction, sales, people, flats, buildings, concrete, vendors, developers, builders
Premium

The case is not pertinent to one home builder, but an order would set a precedence for all those home builders who sold their flats after GST came into effect

Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to the Union government, national anti-profiteering authority, and the GST Council on a petition over quas­hing the proceedings laun­ched against a real estate player on an anti-profiteering complaint.

The directorate general of anti-profiteering (DGAP) had earlier served a notice on a real estate company over a complaint by a home buyer that the builder had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit to him for a unit bought by it in a residential complex, said Abhishek Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co. 

Through the notice, DGAP had sought voluminous details from the

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in