The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) has proposed a Rs 150-200 crore nationwide project to develop genetically modified (Bt) cotton, with genes to provide multiple protection against virus, fungi, etc, beside being reusable.
This has gone to the ministry of agriculture for clearance. The idea is to involve a pan-India network of major agricultural institutes and universities like the Ludhiana-based Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana; the University of Agriculture Sciences, Dharwad; the Govind Ballabh Pant Agricultural University, Pantnagar; the Central Institute of Cotton Research, Nagpur, and so on.
The idea is to also apply the esons learnt from the controversy over the ‘Bikaneri Narma’, the first indigenously developed Bt cotton. ICAR stopped its production and sale (in 2009) after allegations that some of its seeds contained a variety earlier patented by Monsanto, the private chemicals company. An inquiry is underway, being conducted by S K Sopory, vice-chancellor of Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi.
“The idea is that one incident of small contamination or misinformation cannot hinder indigenous research on genetic biotechnology,” Swapan Datta, deputy director-general of crop sciences in ICAR told Business Standard.
| TECHNOLOGY BOOST India’s cotton crop over six decades | |||
| Year | Area* | Production** | Yield# |
| 1950-51 | 5.88 | 3.43 | 99 |
| 1960-61 | 7.61 | 6.01 | 134 |
| 1970-71 | 7.60 | 5.66 | 127 |
| 1980-81 | 7.82 | 7.80 | 169 |
| 1990-91 | 7.43 | 11.70 | 267 |
| 2000-01 | 8.57 | 14.00 | 278 |
| 2001-02 | 8.73 | 15.80 | 308 |
| 2002-03 | 7.66 | 13.60 | 302 |
| 2003-04 | 7.63 | 17.90 | 399 |
| 2004-05 | 8.78 | 24.30 | 470 |
| 2005-06 | 8.67 | 24.10 | 472 |
| 2006-07 | 9.14 | 28.00 | 521 |
| 2007-08 | 9.41 | 30.70 | 554 |
| 2008-09 | 9.40 | 29.00 | 524 |
| 2009-10 | 10.31 | 30.50 | 503 |
| 2010-11 | 11.14 | 33.90 | 517 |
| 2011-12 | 12.19 | 34.50 | 481 |
| *In million hectares; **In million bales. One bale =170 kilograms #Yield in kilograms per hectare; Note: BT Cotton Was Introduced In India In 2002 Source: Cotton Advisory Board | |||
Adding: “Bikaneri Narma had not even reached one per cent of all cotton farmers before its production and sale was stopped. Hence, any chance of it contaminating the existing seeds is virtually non-existent.”
The new programme seeks to address all discrepancies raised at the time of the Bikaneri Narma issue. “The project will not only look at domestically produced advanced genetically modified cotton, but also better varieties of organic cotton,” Datta said.
He said patenting of genes produced by ICAR scientists will help in profit-sharing with private companies with germplasm patents and also sub-licensing of the patented genes developed by ICAR scientists.
India’s per hectare cotton yield has risen 60 per cent since the introduction of Bt cotton in 2002.
