Business Standard

National Anti-Profiteering Authority and the company vs consumer tug-of-war

While businesses have issues with NAA's methodology of computing profiteering, consumers are defending their right to be charged fair prices and are supportive of the authority

GST: Surviving the anti-profiteering gaze
Premium

Representative Image

Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
A debate over the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has taken an interesting twist.

So far, companies have been criticising the gaps in the methodology of computing profiteering and have approached Delhi High Court. The court  clubbed 40 such petitions filed by companies such as Hindustan Unilever, Patanjali, Jubilant Foodworks, Reckitt Benckiser, Johnson & Johnson, Phillips and will hear the matter in November.

Meanwhile, consumer advocacy group CUTS International recently said it will intervene in the matter in the High Court to defend consumers’ rights to be charged fair prices and support the Authority.

It will file an intervention application as

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in