 "New concession agreement is a booster shot for highways, CRISIL")
India's national highways sector has received a big regulatory boost with the ministry of roads and highways clearing amendments to the model concession agreement (MCA) for awarding projects on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis last week. CRISIL Research in its report said two changes including back ending of premium payments and deemed termination of projects are particularly significant. Allowing greater equity contribution by the authority is also another positive step.
Further, stringent penalties on non-compliance of maintenance contracts and collection of real-time traffic data would lend clarity and fix responsibility appropriately. These changes will improve the confidence of both developers and lenders in investing in the sector.
CRISIL Research director Ajay Srinivasan said, "Lender confidence, which was severely damaged in the last few years, will revive with the change in the clause related to premium payment, and introduction of the clause on deemed termination. Further, doubling the cap on equity contribution by the NHAI will make more projects viable at a time when majority of the BOT projects being awarded are on a grant basis."
CRISIL Research believes the changes to the MCA, and to some policies earlier, have significantly improved the outlook on the national highways sector. ''We expect project awards by the NHAI to increase nearly 50% in fiscal 2016. The share of BOT projects, on the other hand, could rise from 25% in fiscal 2015 to over 50% by 2017. A significant improvement in overall execution rates will happen gradually, over a couple of years. But things are definitely - and finally -- looking bright for India's highways sector,'' the report notes.
Under the amended MCA, premium payment starts only from the fourth year after the completion date compared with the first year previously. That's a significant relief to both developers and lenders because most projects end up with debt-service coverage ratio of less than 0.8-1.0 time in the first 3-4 years after completion date. Additionally, the government has enhanced the scope of revenue-shortfall loans to include projects where judicial pronouncements impact cash flows.
Deemed termination of projects that do not progress even after a year of award gives greater clarity on the termination process, but no penalties have been mooted on the awarding authority. Almost half the projects awarded between 2011 and 2013 had to be terminated because of delays in land acquisition and other clearances. To boot, the termination process was complex and painful, taking more than two years in half the instances. And projects that were executed despite delays saw huge cost overruns.
