Bank chairmen failed to reach a consensus over the formulation of a single benchmark prime lending rate (PLR) at their meeting held with the managing committee of the Indian Banks' Association (IBA) in New Delhi today. |
The single benchmark PLR was proposed by the IBA along the lines of the statement made in the monetary and credit policy review by the Reserve Bank of India. |
Sources added that the IBA committee will further re-examine the issue of formulation of PLR and take a closer look at the implications it will have on the existing lending procedures, most of which are not linked to the PLR. |
IBA had proposed a cost-based single benchmark PLR whereby each bank will publish a single PLR which will take into account various cost components like operating costs, asset and liability costs, term premiums, interest rate risk, profit margin, capital charges etc. |
It was proposed that loans outside the purview of PLR will be kept separate but instead of having multiple PLRs, there will be only one PLR. |
However, under this norm, each bank will be free to decide on the spread above the PLR. |
This was expected to reduce the anomaly in the loan market as once a PLR for a bank is defined, it cannot violently swerve when deciding on the rates to offer for loans. |
Bankers are of the view that the issue should be once again re-examined as various loans such as those for home and retail are out of the PLR ambit and it is only the cut-throat competition in the home loans segment that have spurred calls for a single PLR. |
Moreover, there are some clients who take sub-PLR rates. Therefore, a need was felt to look into the matter from a more practical perspective, it was felt. |