The Supreme Court is likely to hear on Jan 21 DMK leader Kanimozhi's plea seeking the quashing of charges against her in the 2G case being exclusively heard by a special CBI court on day-to-day basis.
A bench headed by Chief Justice P. Sathasivam said the 2G bench comprising Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan is likely to sit on Jan 21 and may hear the matter.
Appearing for Kanimozhi, senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi told the court that the plea for the quashing of charges is pending for quite some time while the trial in the matter is going on. He told the court that it has not been listed and they want it to be listed for an early hearing.
A bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi (since retired) and Justice Radhakrishnan had put on hold the hearing on the plea of Kanimozhi and others challenging the framing of charges saying that their fate would be decided only after it decides the challenge to its April 11, 2011 order barring the Delhi High Court from entertaining any plea against the orders of special CBI court hearing 2G cases.
The apex court by its Sep 3, 2012, order rejected the plea by five accused - corporate honchos Shahid Balwa, Vinod Goenka, Rajiv Agarwal and Asif Balwa and Ravinder Kumar Chandolia, a former aide of ex-telecom minister A. Raja - challenging its April 11, 2011 order.
This order had said "...when large public interest is involved, it is the bounded duty of all, including the accused persons, who are presumed to be innocent, until proven guilty, to co-operate with the progress of trial" as "early disposal of the trial is also to their advantage, so that their innocence could be proved..."
"The nation and the people of this country are seriously concerned with the outcome of the cases involving larger public interest, like one concerning 2G and this court, as the guardian of the constitution, has got duty and obligation to see that larger public interest is preserved and protected," the court said then.
Kanimozhi had moved the apex court July 24, 2012, for the quashing of charges framed against her by the special court holding trial in 2G scam cases and also the charge sheet by the CBI. The 2G special court had framed the charges Oct 22, 2011.
She had contended that she was one of the directors of the Kalaignar TV for only a short period of two weeks - from June 6, 2007 to June 20, 2007 - and had nothing to do with the channel's financial transactions.
One of the accused in 2G scam cases, Kanimozhi was charged under Section 120-B (conspiracy), read with 420 (Cheating), 409 (Criminal breach of trust), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (Using as genuine a forged document) 193 (Punishment for false evidence) of Indian Penal Code and other provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act.
A Rajya Sabha member, Kanimozhi had contended that being a 20 percent minority shareholder in Kalaignar TV, she could not be saddled with criminal liabilities of the acts and omission of the company.
She said that allegations made against her pertained to the financial transaction between December 2008 and August 2009 - that is 18 months after she resigned as director.
However, the CBI had said that Kanimozhi was an active brain behind the operation of Kalaignar TV and was in constant touch with Raja for the launching of the channel.
The CBI had said that Kanimozhi was the direct beneficiary of Rs.200 crore that DB Reality had transferred to Kalaignar TV through a circuitous route of two firms M/S Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables and M/S Cineyug Ltd. between December 2008 and August 2009.
