The Importance Of Being Salman Khan (Column: Bollywood Spotlight)

There are basically two kind of actors. Those who get deeply affected by reviews. And those who pretend not to be affected by them.

There is, of course, a third category where an actor genuinely doesn't care what the critics think or say. I am afraid there is only one member of this third super-elitist club -- Salman Khan. He really doesn't care what critics say. For a very long time he didn't care about awards either and very openly said they were a farce.

That changed when Salman actually started winning awards. He stopped badmouthing them. I don't think favourable reviews changed his opinion on critics and reviews. He got them in abundance --favourable reviews, I mean -- for "Bajrangi Bhaijaan" and "Sultan", two recent Salman-fests that I thought would change the course of his career.

 

But his opinion on critics -- extended to a generic distrust of journalists -- is too deeply embedded in his consciousness to change. I know. I have been at the receiving end of his contempt, wrath, ridicule and heckling till I reached a breaking point with him. My last conversation with Salman Khan took place some years ago when he opened the conversation by taunting me for a problem I had faced some time earlier.

It was a disastrous way to start a conversation. And very insensitive. But little did he care. He went on to heap insults on Vivek Oberoi and hung up. He then called back to ask if I was writing any of our conversation. Because if I was, he said he didn't care.

"It is between you and your conscience," Salman warned me.

I don't think Salman cares even today what critics and journalists say and write about him. To that extent he hasn't changed over the years. He has become more tolerant of certain institutions such as the law and the media because of his own experiences. He has also become less judgmental and opinionated.

Some years ago a highly regarded friend-turned-foe journalist was at the receiving end of Salman's sneering campaign when Salman, just before their television interview, made smirking references to the journalist's personal life. This had no bearing on the interview, no bearing on their professional conduct. Salman had no business bringing up the journalist's personal life.

Here is what the unspoken deal between a superstar, specially a superstar called Salman Khan and the media is: he can say and do what he likes. But the mediapersons must say and do what Salman likes.

The yes-men who surround him -- and that includes the directors/music directors who are working with him -- make it easy for Salman to believe he is always right in his attitude, and by extension, in his selection of roles. No one would tell him that "Race 3" is a disgraceful addition to his repertoire of films, specially at this juncture of his career when he has a captive audience to experiment with roles and to extend the frontiers of his talent.

Sadly, we see Salman making no effort to further his skills as an actor in "Race 3". Why should he, when the world is at his feet? In spite of the scathing reviews, "Race 3" has crossed the 100-crore mark during the first four days of release. Salman will rightly argue that the audience loves him and his cinema so why should he change his attitude towards his career or towards anything in his life?

After "Judwaa 2" released, I had asked David Dhawan how he reacted to criticism about his cinema being the same even after three decades?

"Why should I open the bonnet of my car when it is running smoothly?" David commented.

So while the critics are busy looking for new ways to insult Salman's "Race 3", he is already planning "Race 4" probably with more of everything we hated in the current film. What can you do about it?

--IANS

skj/hs