Qualcomm's activist spat offers a lesson for Silicon Valley - but technology companies might not learn the right one. Jana Partners wants the $114-billion chip maker to consider a breakup and reform its board. Hiding behind dual-class stocks, as some tech rivals do, may limit such meddling. But it wouldn't fix Qualcomm's problem of a sleepy board and entrenched management running it below potential.
Qualcomm has been phenomenally successful at discovering ways to transmit data wirelessly and profiting by both producing chips and licensing out its technology. Jana argues that the company is undervalued: put the licensing business on the S&P 500's multiple of 18 times earnings and account for cash on its balance sheet, and investors are attaching essentially no financial worth to its chip business.
The activist argues a breakup could rectify this discount - especially as the chip unit may make a tasty M&A target. It might also ease persistent antitrust investigations into the company.
More From This Section
Jana's on firmer ground arguing for cost cuts, new management incentives and board reform. The founder's son, Paul Jacobs, is executive chairman, and last year he received $9 million of performance stock units and a $45-million restricted stock grant that vests over several years. Three directors have been there for more than 20 years. Meanwhile, management incentives favour top-line growth over shareholder-friendly metrics like return on invested capital.
Having voting control with few shares, as the likes of Google and Facebook do, would have given the company the luxury of just ignoring Jana. That may resonate around the Valley. The real lesson, though, is to beef up performance. Qualcomm has already spotted that it needs to offer its investors something - it has upped its dividend and promised to buy back $15 billion of stock. Adopting some of Jana's sensible suggestions about pay, costs and the board would be an effective way to see the interloper off.
