Business Standard

Saturday, January 18, 2025 | 10:56 PM ISTEN Hindi

Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Claim can't be rejected on mere suspicion

The insurer should have checked where the machines were being located while enhancing cover, not after lodging of claim

Image
Premium

Jehangir B Gai
Oswal Plastic Industries had taken a fire and special perils policy from New India Assurance to cover its industrial establishment. The policy was issued on June 27, 2009. The sum insured was increased to Rs 2.5 crore from July 2, 2009.

A fire occurred on October 17, 2009 in which four machines and some raw materials got damaged. The insurer was intimated, and a claim for Rs 1,34,07,836 was lodged. The surveyor assessed the loss at Rs 29,17,500 on reinstatement basis, and Rs 12,60,000 as the depreciated value.

The claim was repudiated on the ground that the insured machine had been shifted
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in