US stimulus: Departing White House economic adviser Christina Romer says last year’s $814 billion stimulus package fell short. That may suggest those arguing for more fiscal action are gaining ground with the administration. But short of a renewed economic slump, electoral politics are working against more stimulus.
Not that Romer thinks all the spending and tax credits - originally calculated at $787 billion - didn’t work more or less as expected. She believes the US economy would be in far worse shape today without them. But in her valedictory on Wednesday, Romer said the economic team failed to anticipate the violence of the recession. So, despite the stimulus, the output gap and unemployment rate are far worse today than they expected in early 2009. But even with those original, overly rosy assumptions, Romer’s analysis back then suggested the stimulus plan should be bigger, around $1.2 trillion.
Her view was countered by rival adviser Lawrence Summers — he didn’t want President Barack Obama to even see that pricier option - and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, who both thought the plan should be smaller for economic and political reasons. They won that debate. But Romer still thinks additional government action — more spending and more tax cuts - is needed. And, given that the White House seems to be mulling fresh stimulus options, the president may now be inclined to agree with her.
Romer’s speech will surely give hope to liberal critics such as newspaper columnist and economist Paul Krugman who have been hectoring Team Obama to do more. If Democrats suffer historic losses in the November midterms, her remarks may be a cornerstone of the case to replace Summers and perhaps even Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. The heightened expectation of changes in the administration’s economic team is illustrated by the speed with which a now-dispelled rumour about New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg replacing Geithner spread through Wall Street and Washington this week.
But even a dramatic personnel shuffle won’t change the reality that the White House will almost surely face a far more hostile Congress in 2011. Angry liberals will want more spending, emboldened conservatives more tax cuts. Fashioning a politically viable compromise that makes economic sense and won’t alarm bond vigilantes will be a huge challenge. Romer should be relieved that it will be someone else’s.
