European opposition to tariffs on Chinese solar panels sounds like turkeys voting for Christmas. After all, China has used cheap state financing to lower the cost of making solar equipment - and European companies like Germany's Solar World have borne the brunt. Yet, the reluctance of most EU member states to back proposals for a punitive tariff is smart. In a world of cross-border supply chains, Europe has too much to lose by pushing the point.
Germany, which is leading the charge against the European Commission's proposed duties, is also the hardest hit by China's rise from making almost no solar panels a decade ago to some 60 per cent of the world's total output. Among the casualties of the adjustment were Germany's Q-Cells, once the world's biggest cell maker.
Yet, German economy minister Philipp Roesler has said that imposing provisional tariffs, which kick in on June 6, is a 'grave mistake'. He is right for two reasons. The traditional fear, dating back to the global trade slump of the 1930s, is that tariffs breed retaliation in kind. That may happen. China imports most of the polysilicon that goes into solar panels, for example, and is mulling whether Western firms sell for less than their costs.
More From This Section
Across the EU, $16 billion of investment income came from mainland China in 2012. It wouldn't require anything as blatant as trade tariffs for China to make life harder for European companies with big manufacturing bases in the country.
Ultimately trade isn't really about absolute rights and wrongs, but about balancing interests. That explains why despite talk of a return to the 1930s, and China's continuing support for strategic sectors, trade wars haven't happened. The cost of solar panels coming from China may be too low, but as far as tariffs are concerned, the best hope is that politicians continue to see the light.
