Britain's youth have been dealt a rough hand by their elders. Three-quarters of under-25s voted to stay in the European Union (EU) in the UK's June 23 referendum, according to YouGov. That compares to just 39 per cent of over-65s.
With mounting student debt and a slim chance of getting on the housing ladder, under-25s had the economic odds stacked against them even before Brexit. Now - if the Remain camp's pre-vote warnings are borne out - the young face a sharp spike in unemployment, the loss of the right to work across the EU, and lower economic growth relative to a scenario in which the UK voted to stay. The incentive to pack up and leave has shot up overnight.
This isn't just a UK problem. In Italy, older workers' better employment rights and pensions are a political issue. In the United States, the Illinois Supreme Court recently overturned a law that was meant to address a yawning $111-billion pension hole by docking some retiree benefits. The fix will likely come from higher taxes instead - a burden that falls disproportionately on the young.
More From This Section
To grow fast enough to meet these liabilities, the UK economy needs more willing migrants and younger workers, a rapid uptick in productivity growth or, ideally, both. Credit Suisse reckons that the UK's long-term fiscal sustainability gap - the difference between spending commitments and forecast government revenue - is the highest in the EU.
Growth-killing measures - such as reducing immigration - will only make the demographic imbalance worse. Instead, policymakers should focus on easing the fiscal burden on justifiably cheesed-off millennials, by reversing the current deal where the young are expected to pay for the Grey Vote's pensions in return for unaffordable housing and considerably dimmer post-retirement prospects. Inter-generational fiscal transfers will hurt - but the alternative is worse.