Business Standard

Land compensation rule to pharma trademark case, here're key court orders

The Supreme Court has declared unconstitutional a provision in the National Highways Act

A judge hitting gavel with paper at wooden table. (Photo: Shutterstock)
Premium

A judge hitting gavel with paper at wooden table. (Photo: Shutterstock)

M J Antony
Land compensation rule unconstitutional

The Supreme Court has declared unconstitutional a provision in the National Highways Act (NHA), which discriminated between those whose land was compulsorily acquired for building roads and the owners of land acquired for ‘public purposes’ under the Land Acquisition Act (LAA). While those who lost land under the LAA are entitled to solatium and interest, those whose land was taken over for road building were denied that benefit. The landowners moved the Punjab & Haryana High Court against the discrimination, arguing that solatium and interest are integral parts of compensation awardable to persons whose land have been

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in