In his article "India's frontiers: A razor's edge" (November 23) Deepak Lal has failed to understand Nehru's and a newly independent India's core strategy. With Europe's decline after World War II, the US and the Soviet Bloc remained the only major powers. It was clear even then that China and India were great powers of the future.
A newly independent India understandably did not want to become a vassal to either the US or the USSR and wanted to be friends with China. This policy was sound then, and is even sound now. Look at Manmohan Singh's recent statement "When China and India shake hands the whole world watches".
When China began to consolidate its hold on Tibet, the Dalai Lama understandably fled to India. With its liberal traditions India could hardly refuse asylum to the Dalai Lama. This was naturally seen as a threat by China. The 1962 war resulted from China's need to secure Tibet by pre-empting any Indian attack, possibly reinforced by supporters of the Dalai Lama.
Now, with Tibet secured, there is no reason for China to fight India. That both sides have nuclear weapons makes war even more unlikely. Though it makes sense for India to "keep its powder dry" by maintaining adequate military deployment, China is no threat to India.
Alok Sarkar Kolkata
Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to:
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
New Delhi 110 002
Fax: (011) 23720201
E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
