Business Standard

Friday, December 20, 2024 | 07:20 AM ISTEN Hindi

Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Nomination provisions require an overhaul

Nomination rules can be justified as being products of their times, but there is no excuse for not revising them to reflect new realities

EPFO, pension, retirement
Premium

Photo: Shutterstock

Harsh Roongta
There is a need to make succession smoother and simpler by reimagining the entire nomination process. Today I shall write about nomination provisions across retirement schemes: Government Provident Fund (or GPF, applicable to government employees who started their jobs prior to 2005), National Pension System (or NPS, applicable to government employees who started their jobs 2005 onwards, private-sector employees, and the self-employed, including low-income persons under the Pension Lite programme), and Employee Provident Fund (EPF) with Employee Pension Scheme (EPS) and Employee Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme (or EDLIS, applicable to all non-government sector employees).

Despite the vintage of the regulations
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in