Business Standard

Monday, December 23, 2024 | 07:54 PM ISTEN Hindi

Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Right intent, wrong definition

Section 29A of the IBC needs a hard look, indeed

IBC, resolution of IBC cases
Premium

Illustration by Binay Saha

Shyamal Majumdar
Sanjay Singal, promoter of the distressed Bhushan Power & Steel, is an angry man. In his petition before the Supreme Court, Mr Singal has questioned Section 29A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as it is 'ultra vires' of some of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The section bars promoters of defaulting companies from bidding for distressed assets and was implemented with retrospective effect. But the simple question Mr Singal has forgotten to answer is this: Why is he so keen now to pay “fair value” for a company whose debt ballooned to Rs 450 billion under his
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in