There is no "I" in "APEC". Yet the leaders of China and the US are both using the Beijing round of the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) this week to push their own agendas. Using the global stage to play domestic political games leaves room for dangerous mistakes.
President Barack Obama has delivered a slap in the face to his Chinese hosts by arranging to meet heads of state to discuss a trade pact that excludes China. The proposed 12-member Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) includes tough provisions on protecting intellectual property, and could create a channel for companies to sue governments, both of which suit the US. More importantly, it's one of the few things on which Obama has broad support from the opposition Republican Party, which now controls both houses of Congress.
TPP is too complex to be finalised in Beijing. But if Obama can show progress he has a better chance of winning timely Senate support for a fast-track negotiating authority that would let him put TPP to a yes-or-no vote, without amendments. Pursuing talks that could end with something concrete before Obama steps down in 2016 is sensible. China may be invited to join later. Beijing-based ambassador Max Baucus, a vigorous proponent of TPP, can play an important role presenting that deal.
More From This Section
Everyone knows that APEC's harmony is largely a sham. Still, there is good reason to keep up the act. Goodwill among leaders increases the chances that disputes are resolved through words rather than weapons. China and Japan got the tone right last week when they agreed to co-operate despite their differences, but Obama's lack of TPP tact and Xi's triumphalism point in the other direction. When all sides are more interested in competing than collaborating, the world is a less stable place.
