Presidential hopeful Donald Trump says that bankruptcy in the United States is nothing to be ashamed of. In China, where high debt levels are also a concern, it's the opposite: failure is to be avoided vigorously. These opposing views end in the same place. When going bust brings too much pain or too little, disaster can follow.
Trump, in a debate among Republican candidates for November's presidential race televised on August 6, argued that four bankruptcies among his companies don't disqualify him from looking after US businesses. His thinking: laws are there to be used, and most entrepreneurs do. A look at the US courts, which had 1.3 million bankruptcy cases pending at the end of June, suggests he has a point.
Ease of going broke brings risks. While several Wall Street institutions were spared bankruptcy in 2008 on the grounds they were too big to fail, most are too small to matter. A study by the Chicago Booth School of Business suggested that for households with few assets, declaring bankruptcy can be a cheaper way of meeting healthcare costs than buying insurance. The ease of getting into debt, and getting out of it, may help explain US public and private borrowings that McKinsey calculates at 269 per cent of GDP.
More From This Section
For countries with high debts and inflated asset prices, getting failure right matters a lot. The best path is somewhere in the middle: make bankruptcy painful, but not so much that it has to be prevented at all costs. It's a challenge that neither country looks close to mastering.
