Congress today targeted the Prime Minister's Office over the meeting of an Indian journalist with the Mumbai attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed in Pakistan, alleging its "direct involvement" and asked the government to "come clean" on the issue.
Congress leaders raised in Parliament and outside the issue of Ved Pratap Vaidik meeting Saeed, saying the journalist was "very close to Sangh parivar" and rejected the government's contention that it had nothing to do with the meeting.
"This is a very serious issue with regard to national security. The PMO is directly involved in it.
More From This Section
He added, "Now the fourth person, who also worked in the Foundation, Vaidik, whom we knew more as a columnist rather than a regular journalist, had met the most wanted terrorist in India, who is an accused in Mumbai terror strikes. A serious question arises. Did he go to meet Hafiz Saeed at the instruction of the Prime Minister? The Prime Minister and the government must come clean on it."
Vaidik, considered close to Baba Ramdev, has rejected suggestions by Congress that he might have acted as the government's envoy, saying he was "nobody's envoy but my own".
In Rajya Sabha, Leader of the House and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said for India, Saeed was a terrorist and indeed involved in terrorism against India.
Government has nothing to do with "directly, indirectly or even remotely" with any journalist meeting Saeed, he said, adding "government has not sanctioned permission to anyone for meeting him (Saeed).
Rejecting Jaitely's remarks, the Congress spokesperson said that "merely making statements like this" won't do.
"Jaitly has said that the government has nothing to do with it. What he is saying is wrong. PMO is involved in sending him (Vaidik)" to Pakistan," Ahmed, said alleging that people from Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) dominate the Foundation.
"This is not an issue involving Vaidik alone. The entire government is involved in it," he said.
Former Union Minister and senior Congress spokesperson Anand Sharma said that the government needs to answer whether it was "in the loop".
"Such meetings cannot take place without the knowledge of the officials.