Business Standard

'15th Finance Commission speaks of "enigma of two Karnatakas"

Image

Press Trust of India Bengaluru

There is an enigma of two Karnatakas with the existence of both high per capita income and high poverty numbers in the state at the same time, the 15th Finance Commission said on Tuesday, as it stressedon the need for closer attention on the matter.

Also, the debt to GDP ratio in Karnataka is rising and thestate needs to be mindful of this going forward, the commission cautioned,though it is aligned with the targets set as of now.

Commission Chairman N K Singh said it was somewhat ironic that as one speaks of Karnatakaas India's engine of growth, home of technology and startup industries and where entrepreneurialinstincts come naturally, per capita income is significantly higher than that of the nation, but poverty numberswere unacceptably high.

 

"In a sense as what many have said there is not one Karnataka, there are two Karnatakas," he said.

One was a prosperousKarnataka and alongside it one far less prosperous and which really demonstrated how intra-state disparities could mask really the overall performance,he said, adding that was an area deserving closer attention.

The Commission officials said according to information shared with them, the poverty rate in Karnataka stood at 21 per cent.

The Commission, which is on a visit to Karnataka for the last two days, has held discussions with all stakeholders, panchayat institutions, Urban Local Bodies, representatives of all political parties, as also interaction with Chief Minister H D Kumaraswamy, Ministers and government officials.

Singh said Karnataka represents an engine of India's economic growth, contributing close to eight per cent of the national GDP and has spectacular records in terms of conformity on many components of financial discipline.

Noting that Karnataka was not only the first state, but preceded the national government in the enactment of the fiscalresponsibility management act, Singh said the state has an exceedingly credible record of conforming to all the importantmacro-economic parameters.

He said the government has responded positively to concerns raised by a commission member that the debt to GDP was rising and the state would have to be 'mindful' of remaining aligned with thebroad trajectory.

Complimenting the Karnataka government,saying itsfiscal numbers are more genuine and reliable compared to manystates, the commission lauded the management of overallfinances of the state.

"They have made credible progress with respect to mostof the parameters of the sustainable development goals, excepton education outcome and anemia in children, where there is still scope for improvement," it said.

Noting that Karnataka has faced eight years of drought in the last 10 years, Singh said there is drought proneness,a need to do a lot to improve irrigation to complete many languishing irrigation projects and to improve agriculture production and productivity.

He noted that Karnataka also arguedthat notwithstanding its proneness to frequent droughts,the resources they received in the last financecommission, particularly for NDRF and SDRF, was "below" whatthe state deserved.

"We will certainly look into this with thesympathy which this deserves," Singh said.

Chief Minister Kumaraswamy during his meeting with the Commission, said 'injustice' has been done to Karnataka in allocation under State and National DisasterRelief Fund and urged it to substantially increase allocations for the state.

He also brought up the point ofmuch deeper rationalization of centrally sponsored schemes.

Singh said Karnataka believes that following the 14th Finance commission's award, the sharing with respect to the centrally sponsored schemes has put an onerous burden on the state and therefore mitigates to a large extent, the benefits of higher devolution of funds.

"...this is also an area of generic concern to many states," he said.

The Chief Minister informed the Commission that it must ensure that once the sharing formula isdecided, the Central Government should not reduce the funding under the centrally sponsored schemes, both in terms of size and the sharing pattern between Centre and State.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: Jun 25 2019 | 7:45 PM IST

Explore News