'Arab Spring', the popular term used to describe the uprisings in the Middle East in recent years, is more complicated and nuanced than commonly believed, according to a new study.
Qatar-based Northwestern University's professor of journalism Ibrahim Abusharif explored the range of perspectives around the phrase in Parsing Arab Spring, a paper that is part of a series contributing analysis to a debate - recently published by the university.
The uprisings in the Middle East since the winter of 2010-11 was referred as the 'Arab Spring'.
"It's important to look at language, especially as it frames issues like what has been called Arab Spring. This is especially true when the origin of a phrase is outside the region it describes," Abusharif said.
Based on a study analyzing more than 100 publications about the popular phrase that frames the uprisings in the Arab world, Parsing Arab Spring offers a careful and comprehensive look at how the term came to be--and to such wide acceptance.
The publication looks at the historical roots of the term Arab Spring as well as descriptors used in Arabic press. It also explores how the spring descriptor came to be used by other regions going through political strife and why some circles have criticized the term.
"The linguistic and historical root of the word 'spring' is very European. Using this terminology to describe an event in the Arab world for the benefit of a Western audience can be seen as wishful thinking for a democratization movement. Language matters; it frames events because it influences how people think and perhaps what they do. Sometimes the framing is accurate and sometimes it's questionable," Abusharif said.
"Abusharif's work offers clear, academic insight on theories exploring the power of language in the context of mass, complex social and political movements. This builds on an important line of journalistic study into public affairs and how public perception is influenced by the media," said NU-Q Dean and CEO Everette E. Dennis.
