Former minister of state for coal Santosh Bagrodia, former coal secretary H C Gupta and retired public servant L S Janoti were summoned on Tuesday as accused by a Special Court in connection with a coal block allocation scam case.
Special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Judge, Bharat Parashar took cognisance of CBI’s final report in the case pertaining to alleged irregularities in allocation of Bander coal block in Maharashtra to accused firm AMR Iron and Steel Pvt Ltd.
The court summoned the accused for the alleged offences under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy) read with 420 (cheating), 409 (criminal breach of trust by the public servant) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under relevant provisions of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act.
More From This Section
It had also directed CBI to probe further in the case and had asked the agency to place relevant records of the matter before the sanctioning authority to consider according of the sanction to prosecute Janoti under the Prevention of Corruption Act as he was then an active public servant.
Janoti, who was earlier posted in the coal ministry, retired as Under Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs.
CBI had earlier told the court that the issue of grant of sanction to prosecute Janoti was still pending before the competent authority and since more than four months had elapsed, it should be deemed that the sanction to try him was granted.
The court had earlier granted bail to Vijay Darda, Devendra and Jayaswal after they had appeared before it. Vijay Darda had denied the allegations against him.
Regarding Janoti, the court had observed that he had allegedly prepared a “misleading note” on the issue relating to coal block allocation which, in the overall facts and circumstances, appeared to be a deliberate move on his part to benefit AMR and its directors. The charge sheet was filed against the accused on May 27 last year for alleged offences under IPC and PC Act.
Regarding AMR Iron and Steel Pvt Ltd, CBI had claimed in its First Information Report that the firm, in its application form for allocation of coal blocks, had “fraudulently” concealed the fact that its group firms had previously been allocated five coal blocks.