A controversy has erupted over the appointment of an Additional Director in CBI after Government and Central Vigilance Commission(CVC) locked horns over the choice of an officer whose track record was under question.
The row centred around Archana Ramasundaram, a 1980-batch IPS officer from Tamil Nadu, who was appointed as Additional Director last week, after the anti-corruption watchdog CVC refused to send more than one name for the post.
Sources in the government said today that the Appointments' Committee of Cabinet (ACC) had asked for names from CVC, which decided to send only one name for the post despite receiving a panel of names of three officers from the Department of Personnel and Training(DoPT).
More From This Section
The CVC chose a name from out of the three and sent it to the ACC which had rejected it, saying that there was "dispute" over the officer and that seniority could not be ignored.
The ACC, which is headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, asked the CVC to follow the rules and submit a complete panel before the Committee.
However, the CVC sent the name of the same officer and the Government rejected it again. The government summoned the panel from the DoPT and selected Ramasundaram for the post.
Ramasundaram, who has served in the CBI as Deputy Inspector General and Joint Director, was selected keeping in mind her expertise in handling economic offence cases.
The woman officer, who is at present posted as Director General in the Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, had investigated Telgi stamp scam case besides other economic offence cases.
Slamming the government, BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sithraman said its decision to ignore the CVC is "in line with Congress' attempts to dilute the institutions and not to adhere to the checks and balances and taking opaque decisions."
"I am questioning the procedure of appointing the officer. This is the same way PJ Thomas was appointed as the CVC by it earlier," she added.