The Supreme Court today asked the four death row convicts in the December 16 gangrape and murder case to file affidavits on the mitigating circumstances for its consideration.
A bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra, R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan asked the counsel for the condemned convicts, who have challenged their conviction and death penalty in the sensaitonal case, to file the affidavits, detailing the mitigating and other circumstances which favour them.
The oral direction came in the wake of submission of senior advocate Raju Ramachandran, who is assisting the bench as an amicus curiae, that the trial court and the high court were "so overwhelmed by the nature of the crime" that they did not follow the proper procedure for sentencing the accused in the instant case.
Also Read
Ramachandran had submitted that the courts below did not consider the mitigating circumstances of indvidual accused in the case.
"The accused and their counsel were not asked questions about their individual backgrounds and the mitigating factors, there was no application of mind to the case of each accused and therefore, no separate reasons were given for the imposition of death penalty on each of the accused," he had said, adding this had resulted in denial of right to equality and protection of life and liberty under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India respectively.
Earlier, the court, which has been hearing final arguments in the case from April 4 last year, had appointed senior lawyers Ramachandran and Sanjay Hegde as amicus curiaes.
While Ramachandran would assist the court in appeals of convicts, Mukesh and Pawan, Hegde would assist in appeals of other two convicts, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Kumar Singh.
These four convicts had approached the apex court against the Delhi High Court's March 13, 2014 verdict which had observed that their offence fell in the rarest of rare category and had upheld the death sentence awarded to them by the trial court.
A 23-year-old paramedic was brutally assaulted and gangraped by six persons in a moving bus in south Delhi and thrown out of the vehicle with her male friend on the night of December 16, 2012. She had died in a Singapore hospital on December 29.
The prime accused, Ram Singh, was found dead in a cell in Tihar Jail in March 2013 and proceedings against him were abated.
The bench had prima facie agreed with the contention of
Ramachandran that provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), relating to sentencing of convicts, has not been followed in letter and spirit by the trial court in the case.
A 23-year-old paramedic was brutally assaulted and gangraped by six persons in a moving bus in south Delhi and thrown out of the vehicle with her male friend on the night of December 16, 2012. She had died in a Singapore hospital on December 29 that year.
The trial court had awarded death penalty to convicts, Mukesh, Pawan, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Kumar Singh. The fifth and one of the key accused, Ram Singh, had allegedly committed suicide inside jail during the trial.
Besides senior advocate Ramachandran, another senior lawyer Sanjay Hegde is also assisting the court as amicus curiae in the matter.
While Ramachandran is assisting the court in appeals of convicts Mukesh and Pawan, Hegde is assisting in appeals of convicts, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Kumar Singh.
These four convicts had approached the apex court against the Delhi High Court's March 13, 2014 verdict which had said that their offence fell in the rarest of rare category and had upheld the death sentence awarded to them by the trial court.
The prime accused, Ram Singh, was found dead in a cell in Tihar Jail in March 2013 and proceedings against him were abated.
