Facing sustained attack from ally Shiv Sena and the Opposition Congress-NCP over the separate Vidarbha issue, Devendra Fadnavis today declared in the Assembly he is the Chief Minister of entire Maharashtra and asserted there is no proposal "as of this moment" to bifurcate the State.
With the commotion over the issue refusing to die down in both Houses of the legislature, the Opposition demanded in the Council the Chief Minister, who hails from Nagpur in Vidarbha, move a motion putting it unambiguously clear that bifurcation of the State was not on the government's agenda.
Raising the issue in the Assembly, Sunil Prabhu (Shiv Sena) asked Fadnavis to clarify his stand on the emotive matter and demanded slapping of treason charge against those who raised slogans for a separate Vidarbha State in the House.
More From This Section
"I am the Chief Minister of an "Akhand (united) Maharashtra," Fadnavis declared. "While BJP has been in favour of (creation of) smaller states, Sena has opposed it."
"Both the parties are in the government. This is not the government's stand," he added, and appealed to the members to put a stop to the discussion on the Vidarbha issue.
The Chief Minister, however, hit out at the Sharad Pawar-led party, saying the "NCP doesn't have any right to seek my resignation. People have that right."
"Ask NCP's Praful Patel who has backed separate Vidarbha. Should we discuss in the House what he has said (on statehood issue)?" asked the CM.
"We have taken an oath to be true to the Constitution. The Constitution provides for a member in the House to put forth his views on formation of a separate State. A criminal offence cannot be filed against him for this," Fadnavis said.
The Congress-NCP legislators, however, shouted slogans in support of a united Maharashtra as Shiv Sena lawmakers also joined them.
In an attempt to corner BJP, the Opposition in the Council demanded that Fadnavis move a motion in the House favouring Unified Maharashtra inclusive of Belgaum and Nippani (areas in Karnataka claimed by Maharashtra).
Leader of Opposition Dhananjay Munde (NCP) said Opposition was not satisfied with the Chief Minister's reply in the Assembly and would not be pacified till the government brings a resolution favouring a unified Maharashtra.
The proceedings in the Upper House were adjourned three times amid uproar before Chairman Ramraje Nimbalkar adjourned the Council ahead of the day's schedule.
(Reopens BOM13)
As soon as the Upper House reassembled at 12.30 PM for the Question Hour, Sunil Tatkare (NCP) sought to move an adjournment motion demanding the BJP-led government bring a motion favouring a united Maharashtra.
Tatkare alleged some people with vested interests were talking of separating Mumbai and Vidarbha from Maharashtra.
"Ever since the BJP-led government has come to power deliberate attempts are being made to fan these sentiments."
The former Minister slammed the veiled threats being issued about possible dissolution of the Legislative Council.
To this, Leader of the House and Revenue Minister Chandrakant Patil said Fadnavis only replied to Jayant Patil (NCP), who had remarked his party would stall the passage of government bills in the Upper House.
Replying to the debate, Patil said the Chief Minister has repeatedly and categorically stated there is no proposal before the Government for creation of a separate state of Vidarbha.
Earlier, when the House reconvened after an adjournment, Tatkare said BJP had come to power on a 'Modi' wave. "Dissolve the Assembly and go for fresh polls. Don't take Modi's name and hold election over separate Vidarbha."
Patil again tried to intervene, arguing when the demand for adjournment motion has already been rejected by the Chair, how can they (NCP) raise the issue all over again. He said the Opposition could raise new issues.
Tatkare argued the government stand on the Vidarbha issue was not clear.
Neelam Gorhe, who was in the Chair, directed Patil to request the Chief Minister to come to the House and make a statement.
Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Girish Bapat said the Opposition was raising the same issues and wanted the House to take up debate on government bills.