Business Standard

Wednesday, December 25, 2024 | 10:46 AM ISTEN Hindi

Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

HC seeks DDCA, SDMC reply on Kirti Azad's plea

Image

Press Trust of India New Delhi
The Delhi High Court today sought the response of DDCA and South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) on a plea by suspended BJP MP Kirti Azad seeking to intervene in a matter concerning the holding of cricket matches at Ferozshah Kotla stadium here.

A bench of Justices S Muralidhar and Najmi Waziri issued notice to Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) and the municipal body seeking their reply on Azad's plea to be made a party in the matter so that he can assist the court.

The politician-cum-former cricketer has said he wants to place before the bench the alleged irregularities committed by the cricketing body.
 

The court listed Azad's application for hearing on August 22 along with the main petition of DDCA, moved in 2010, seeking an occupancy certificate from the corporation to hold matches at the stadium.

The application comes in the wake of a recent report by Justice Mukul Mudgal, who was appointed observer to oversee the conduct of the 2016 T2O World Cup earlier this year, pointing to various deficiencies in DDCA. He had observed that BCCI being the parent body, has to ensure that the Delhi cricketing body is "transparent in its functioning".

Justice Mudgal was appointed as observer after SDMC had said that the Kotla ground lack various clearances which were required before an occupancy certificate was granted.

Thereafter, SDMC in March this year issued an occupancy certificate to DDCA for the stadium, saying that it was fully satisfied that the deviations in the stadium's structure have been rectified by the association in terms of the sanctioned plan of 2005.

The municipal body had, however, clarified that occupancy certificate was for the entire stadium barring R P Mehra block, which falls within 100 metres of a protected monument and thus lacks ASI clearance.
The legal opinion stated that the action of Justice

Mudgal in appointing a "selection panel" was an unauthorised intrusion into DDCA affairs and a clear violation of the mandate as directed by high court in its order on November 11, 2015.

Mishra said "This is contempt of court as Justice Mudgal was appointed to oversee the affairs of DDCA as well. They are casting imputations against him."

Taking note of the submission, the bench said Justice Mudgal was appointed as observer to oversee the overall functioning of DDCA and not only the matches to be played at the stadium.

Justice Mudgal was appointed as observer in November last year to oversee the test matches to be played at Ferozeshah Kotla stadium in December.

This arrangement was extended time and again by the high court which had asked Justice Mudgal to oversee the T-20 matches, T-20 world cup and IPL.

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: Aug 05 2016 | 7:02 PM IST

Explore News