Delhi High Court today sought the government's response on a plea by a French woman challenging the government's decision to extradite her after ratifying a 118-year-old treaty on charges that she had participated in a Chilean senator's killing in 1991.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath issued notice to the External Affairs Ministry (MEA) seeking its reply on the plea of the woman, who has sought an interim stay of the extradition order as well as the notification by which the 118-year-old treaty has been given effect to.
"We are on the question whether detention of the petitioner was done in accordance with law or not. These (challenge to notification and treaty) are major questions and require consideration. Necessary counter affidavits be filed. Same be filed on or before July 31," the bench said.
Also Read
The woman, Marie Emmanuelle Verhoeven, has also challenged her detention and sought that she be produced before the court.
Meanwhile, another bench of the high court has agreed to hear her bail plea on July 27.
56-year-old Verhoeven, a French national, was arrested on February 16 in Uttar Pradesh while she was entering India from Nepal and has been in judicial custody ever since. She is alleged to have participated in the assassination of Chilean senator Jaime Guzman Errazuriz on April 1, 1991.
On April 28, MEA, through a notification, had validated a 118-year-old extradition treaty between the United Kingdom and Chile, which when signed in 1897, was applicable to all British colonies including India.
Seeking interim relief for Verhoeven, senior advocate A S Chandhiok, who appeared for her, contended that the MEA's decision to give retrospective effect to the treaty was "illegal, arbitrary, mala fide and discriminatory".
He said the extradition treaty between Britain and Chile was signed under the Extradition Acts of 1870 to 1895, which was repealed by the Extradition Acts of 1989 and 2003.
In 1918, the applicability of the Extradition Act of 1870 on India was revoked and Fugitive Offenders Act of 1881 was made applicable, he said and added that in 1955, the Supreme Court had held that latter legislation cannot be kept alive as a consequence of Article 372 of the Constitution.
"Consequently, it is most respectfully submitted that the Extradition Treaty dated April 28, 2015 between India and Chile is unconstitutional, arbitrary, illegal and mala fide and must be struck down," the application filed though advocate Ramni Taneja has said.
