Senior Haryana Minister Anil Vij today again trained guns on the previous Bhupinder Singh Hooda-led Congress regime, alleging that the former Chief Minister had gone out of the way to clear over 3,000sqm land in Panchkula to Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) 10 years ago.
"Ex CM Haryana B S Hooda was so eager to oblige Gandhi Parivar in National Herald case that he himself signed the the illegal order," Vij tweeted.
In more tweets, he alleged that rules had been flouted by the former Chief Minister "despite negative noting on the file" by concerned officers.
More From This Section
Interacting with reporters here after the tweets, Vij alleged that "Hooda was in a hurry to oblige his political masters. He even did not care about the legal advice given to him at that time which was against making this allotment. If land was to be alloted, advertisements should have been placed and proper procedure should have been followed."
"It is also rare that the then Chief Minister himself signed the file," Vij claimed.
(REOPENS DES58)
Vij, while referring to the allotment made ten years back, had a few days back alleged that "this is the property of Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) now which was given this prime plot in upscale Sector 6 of Panchkula by the previous Hooda government, just six months after it came to power in Haryana in 2005."
Vij had alleged that "it is a serious issue which has come to fore, which shows how rules were bent/ignored by the previous Hooda government, which gave 3,360 square metres of prime plot in Panchkula at throwaway prices".
Vij, the five-time BJP MLA from Ambala Cantt, had also said that on August 14, 2014, two months before the Haryana Assembly polls, an Occupation Certificate (OC) was issued for the four-storey building on the plot.
Asked that about reports saying AJL plot was categorised as "government office" and HUDA records showing that it valued the property at Rs 59.3 lakh when it was allotted, Vij said, when Herald case is before courts, "we hope all these facts which have come to light now would be taken cognisance of".
(REOPENS NRG31)
Hooda refuted the charges that any favour had been shown to anyone or that rules were bent in alloting the plots.
"As far as I can recall, the plot was already alloted, it was only restored," Hooda told reporters when asked to respond to the charges levelled by Vij.
He said the case should not be singled out as many other similar allotments were made.
Hooda said the plots were also alloted to some media organisations.
"But there is no question of any favour. We did not violate any law while making these allotments," Hooda asserted.