Sen, who was given a farewell by the Bar Council, said, "I have been ever mindful of the oath of office to which I have sworn adherence on my elevation as a high court judge. I have consciously endeavoured not to harbour any bias or ill will and equally favouritism, to any person, be it a member of the bar or a litigant public. The larger part of my career has been spent as an advocate and therefore it is understandable that my sympathies remain with the bar.
"However, that does not justify any undue favouritism to the bar association when a judicial verdict is to be rendered. It has been my belief that if partiality is shown to any party, it will not remain only a first time, it shall inexorably be followed by meting out similar treatment to others. Therefore, it cannot be appreciated that a bar association should boycott any court if the decision or verdict is not to their likes and wishes", he said.
His remarks come in the backdrop of the token boycott call (CJ's court) given by the Advocates Association of Bangalore about six months ago.
He suggested that high court must have a separate bar association.
