Kurien proved that rural enterprises could be run without govt support

The man believed in keeping as much distance from the government as possible to be able to translate is innovative ideas into practice

‘Courage’ and ‘conviction’ were the two assets that stood out starkly in Dr Verghese Kurien’s multifarious personality. He was the man who, even while sitting in the agriculture ministry, could call its abode Krishi Bhawan as “Kursi Bhawan”, alluding unabashedly to the all-pervasive bureaucracy there. His courage was visible also when, digressing from the main milk business, he ventured into the processing and marketing of edible oils under the brand name of ‘Dhara’, challenging the monopolistic hold of a few oil dealers of those days, referred commonly as the ‘Telia Rajas’. This, of course, led to a couple of attempts on his life but he remained undeterred.

Dr Kurien’s conviction was reflected in his faith that even rural enterprises, dealing with illiterate farmers and farm women, could be run on modern lines and use modern technology without any support from the government. In fact, he believed in keeping as much distance from the government as possible to be able to translate is innovative ideas into practice.

The Amul model of dairy development owed its success to a great extent to the policy of self-reliance. He viewed accepting government support or subsidies as an open invitation to official interference that would ultimately prove counterproductive.  A sizable part of the resources needed for developing the infrastructure for collection, chilling, transportation and distribution of milk in the initial stages of the Operation Flood project of dairy development were raised through the sale of the milk powder and milk fat received as gift from abroad.

Though his approach was questioned by many on the plea that it was unfair to earn money by selling free gifts, but Dr Kurien felt that this route was better than seeking a dole from the government.

Dr Kurien’s revulsion to the mode of functioning of the government was not confined to red-tapism alone. He disliked the very work culture in the government offices and wanted the employees function under the Operation Flood or in the Amul cooperative society to operate from posh-looking and well-maintained offices. “How could you expect high efficiency and good output from an employee operating from a shabby working place similar to a government office?” he would often say.

He was, therefore, very particular about the décor and environment in the offices of the agencies headed by him.

While Dr Kurien’s contribution to the development of the cooperative movement in India is well known but what is not fully appreciated is the role he played in seeking autonomy and freedom from official stranglehold for the cooperatives. To achieve this objective, he along with two other leading champions of the cooperative movement – late Dr L.C.Jain, the former deputy chairman of the Planning Commission, and late Mr Mohan Dharia, a former Union minister – launched a “Cooperative Initiative” in the 1980s. This movement ultimately forced the government to pass the long-pending Multi-State Cooperative (amendment) Act which allowed the large cooperatives to liquidate government equity and free themselves of the government’s clutches.

However, it was the irony of the fate that this man of action and unrestrained vision, who seldom tasted defeat in his prime days, had to finally bow down to his detractors from within the organisation that he nurtured. In fact, the key ones among them were those whom he had himself groomed. Alas, Dr Kurien did not die as a happy person.