German Chancellor Angela Merkel called today for answers over "grave" US spying accusations which, she said in a speech to parliament, were testing transatlantic ties, including fledging trade talks.
Ahead of a special debate on US secret-service snooping on German soil which included her mobile phone, Merkel kicked off a statement to parliament meant to tackle another issue by addressing the US espionage claims.
"The transatlantic relationship and therefore also the negotiations for a free-trade agreement are presently without doubt being put to the test by the remaining accusations against the US and the collection of millions of data," Merkel told MPs.
More From This Section
Merkel, who went on to speak about EU partnerships with Eastern European nations, did not directly mention the surveillance of her phone.
But she stressed that the relationship with the US was of "paramount" importance for Germany and Europe.
Lawmakers called a special parliamentary debate on the revelations that have put the US in the firing line and strained diplomatic ties, also casting a shadow over EU-US talks on what would be the world's biggest free-trade accord.
Merkel was not due to speak during the debate but was expected to face tough questions from opposition MPs, who have denounced the government's response as "feeble" until evidence emerged that the chancellor herself had been a target, reportedly since 2002.
With US President Barack Obama's June visit to Berlin still fresh in many minds, deputies will examine the impact on US-German ties of sweeping surveillance, revealed in leaked US National Security Agency (NSA) documents.
And they will likely hear calls for Germany to grant asylum to Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor who is behind the leaks that have fed near-daily media reports for months and is wanted in the US on criminal charges.
Hans-Christian Stroebele, a veteran Greens party MP who recently met Snowden in Russia where he has temporary asylum, said Germany owed the US fugitive not only thanks but a safe and permanent residence.
"Granting him asylum wouldn't be about revenge or retaliation for spying on us. It would be a decision based on our fundamental values -- and a moral duty," he wrote in a New York Times editorial.