Sunday, March 16, 2025 | 12:32 AM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Nitish says, he had initially opposed bifurcation of Bihar

Image

Press Trust of India Patna

"I was initially opposed to the bifurcation of Bihar not only due to long association of the people of the two states, but also for economic losses to Bihar after carving out of Jharkhand," he said at function here.

Kumar said he withdrew his opposition after the NDA government made a provision in the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, to create a cell in the Planning Commission to provide special assistance to Bihar to compensate it for losses arising out of creation of Jharkhand.

Jharkhand has always been a lucrative place in view of abundance of natural resources which fostered economic activities and industrialisation, besides development of infrastructure, educational institutions and related sectors, he said.

 

"I still maintain that the bifurcation of the state was a little too premature," Kumar said.

Even the state government in the erstwhile united Bihar heavily invested in Jharkhand districts and gave further impetus to development there which attracted people from the state and elsewhere in the country to seek job and prosperity there, he added.

  

Don't miss the most important news and views of the day. Get them on our Telegram channel

First Published: May 07 2012 | 9:05 PM IST

Explore News