The judge said Sangma's allegation that Mukherjee had held an office of profit as Chairman of ISI can be resolved only on the basis of evidence presented by the parties.
"Whether the said office carries any remuneration and/or perquisites or the same is under the control of the union government as also the question whether the respondent had resigned from the said office on 20.6.2012 are all questions of facts which are in dispute and, therefore, capable of resolution only on the basis of such evidence as may be adduced by the parties," he said. (more)
