A youth has been acquitted of the charges of murdering his father over a property dispute by a Delhi court which noted that police could not recover the victim's body and it still remained a question "whether he was dead or alive".
The alleged motive in itself cannot be an incriminating evidence, Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala noted while absolving Delhi resident Diwakar of charges of murder, abduction and conspiracy.
Besides Diwakar, who was estranged from his father Niranjan Singh, the court also acquitted five others arrested in the case.
More From This Section
The court also noted that prosecution witnesses, who had earlier told the police that they had last seen the victim with Diwakar and his five accomplices, had turned hostile.
"The prosecution had based the case on circumstantial evidence and on the basis of last seen theory. However, none of the witnesses supported the case of prosecution by deposing any fact which could establish and support the last seen theory," it said.
While rejecting the prosecution's argument that Diwakar had strained relations with his father, the court said, "Through all these facts, prosecution wanted to establish a motive for accused Diwakar to hatch a conspiracy along with other accused persons to kidnap and kill his father.... The alleged motive in itself cannot be an incriminating evidence in respect of charges under the IPC."
According to prosecution, on November 15, 2006, Radhey Lal lodged a missing complaint of his brother Niranjan who had not returned home for two days.
Lal told the police that Niranjan had separated from his wife and son Diwakar and there was a property dispute between them because of which Diwakar conspired to killed him.
Diwakar and his accomplices were arrested after he and one of his aide Multan had allegedly confessed about killing Niranjan and throwing his body in a canal near Meerut, it said, adding that remaining accused, Arun Kumar, Ashwani, Nitu Kumar and Suresh were apprehended later.
During the trial, all the accused denied the allegations and claimed that they were falsely implicated.