By Katharina Bart and Oliver Hirt
ZURICH (Reuters) - Valiant
The deal between the United States and Switzerland, agreed in August, is part of a U.S. drive to lift the veil of Swiss bank secrecy. In 2009, this led to UBS
The U.S. pursuit of tax dollars sheltered in offshore accounts has piled pressure on Switzerland, the world's largest offshore finance centre with more than $2 trillion in assets.
The Swiss government in June bowed to repeated attacks on banking secrecy, deeply embedded in the country's culture, and will share data on foreign depositors if a global standard is established.
Also Read
Under the latest U.S. deal, Swiss banks were given until Monday by their regulator to say whether they would take part in the government-brokered programme open to a host of second-tier Swiss banks.
The programme, which lapses at year-end, requires the banks to hand out some previously hidden information and face penalties of up to 50 percent of assets they managed on behalf of wealthy Americans. If the banks shun the U.S. offer, individual firms and senior staff risk criminal prosecution.
The regulator FINMA said on Tuesday that most had done so, and that it expected several more to do so shortly, without disclosing what the banks had decided.
Valiant Holding and Berner Kantonalbank
The fines are scaled to reflect how egregiously the banks acted in their dealings with U.S. customers. Fines would have to be disclosed to investors because they could have an impact on share prices.
A third -- Zurich-based private bank and securities firm Vontobel Holding AG
How many of Switzerland's 300-plus private banks come forward under the programme is also key for banks facing criminal investigations, which includes some of Switzerland's biggest banks such as Credit Suisse
A host of listed private banks such as EFG International
These publicly-listed banks, which are subject to disclosure rules, give the first indication of how many firms will cooperate with the U.S. authorities under the plan.
But most Switzerland's private banks are not listed and under no obligation to make their decision public.
Major player Lombard Odier & Cie said it is still evaluating what to do. Others such as J. Safra Sarasin, Union Bancaire Privee and Mirabaud did not respond to request for comment on Tuesday.
A legal expert said FINMA's Monday deadline was merely intended to take the temperature of Swiss banks' intentions, and that they have three more weeks until the legally-binding deadline to take up the deal lapses.
"I think roughly 100 banks will end up coming forward - the coming weeks will show how many succumb to the pressure," Peter V. Kunz, professor of business law at Berne University, said.
A failure to cooperate could also hold up a settlement for Credit Suisse, Julius Baer, Pictet, and local government-backed Zuercher Kantonalbank (ZKB), which have seen settlement talks with U.S. justice officials frozen pending a solution for the wider industry.
(Editing by Matthew Tostevin and Jane Merriman)